SL    
     



See full English Heritage Letter

Gallini Forensic Report

Stag Plans for Archery Grounds

Latest Press

Public Meeting June 2011

Lamps Stolen from Archery Ground

Uplands School and the Archery (Burton) Terrace

Private Eye, Piloti Article

The Georgian Article Burton St Leonards

Why we are Objecting

Council chase Gladedale for £19m

Stephen Gray's Critique

Macarron's Critique

Development in 3d

Cookson's Promise

No Planning Brief

Presentation

STAG animation

SLWATCH

The College site is empty and vulnerable.
Please report any suspicious activity to:

POLICE

PC Nick Bellhouse - 07787 685776

PCSO Andy Hubbard - 07787 685793

OR CALL 999

SECURITAS - 0800716586

HASTINGS BOROUGH COUNCIL

Anti-social reporting line: 08000 854500

Environmental enforcement and community officers:

Sue Dedman - 07966 324509

Manoj Babu - 07966 298732

Peter Rolfe - 07966 190416

 

 

Gladedale submit revised plans….again!

The STAG team has examined the latest ‘amendments’ to Gladedale’s 2009 development plans. We are disappointed to report that they completely ignore the concerns of local people, just as the last batch of ‘amendments’ did six months ago.

Astonishingly, given the length of time in preparation, the latest submission is also mired in mistakes, omissions, misinformation and obfuscation.

It talks grandly of Gladedale’s scheme “preserving and enhancing” the area, of bringing back “derelict” buildings into beneficial use and creating “a sustainable residential community within a stunning landscape setting”.

In fact, it does none of these things. While there have been some improvements to the layout and environment of the listed Burton terrace (the former art school), the bulk of the scheme remains as overbearing, unsympathetic and intrusive as ever.

Rather than meaningfully reducing the number of housing units (the total is down from 163 to 155), Gladedale has shuffled the arrangement of on-site parking spaces to make room for a fenced, rectangular patch of grass in the middle of the development which would seem to serve no useful function other than as an exercise area for dogs.

The only significant change from the last set of plans is that this time Gladedale has enlisted the help of specialist, heritage architects to add some gravitas – and gloss - to their application. But if the intention was to disguise its inadequacies, it hasn’t worked.

The development is the same combination of off-the-shelf ‘town’ houses and unimaginative blocks of flats; virtually the same site footprint; the same high density; the same undistinguished architecture.

The scores of one and two-bedroom flats are just as uncongenial as before. Many are mean-sized and some are crammed into north facing blocks with restricted daylight and an outlook onto a shadowy bank.

Like its predecessors, the latest plan bypasses explicit policies designed to protect important conservation areas. In particular, it treats the visually interesting topography of the Archery Ground as a problem to be overcome.

Squeezing blocks of flats into the northern end of the site will require the sloping banks to be cut back and contained behind concrete retaining walls, at the cost of many mature trees and shrubs that give the area its rural character.

What can still be identified as the bowl of the original quarry – used by the Burtons to extract stone for building their New Town - will be partially filled with spoil and then levelled to create a base for new building.

If these plans are approved, STAG believes they will permanently damage the unique townscape and heritage assets of the Burton area.

The archaeological and historic importance of the Archery Ground will be obliterated.

The character and social cohesion of the area will be threatened.

The Archery Ground will be reduced to a crowded, concrete, urban ghetto.

Some specific objections:


  1. Relocation of on-site parking spaces will mean that visitors and some residents will have to park in neighbouring streets. The allocation of disabled spaces is inadequate.

  2. Massing and scale of some housing blocks will overwhelm historic buildings, including Decimus Burton’s terrace (formerly the art school) and Bannow nursing home, designed by Norman Shaw.

  3. Destruction of mature trees along the boundary with Archery Road will damage the semi-rural nature of the area and impact adversely on listed buildings in The Mount and The Highlands.

  4. Provision of cycle spaces falls below ESCC standards.

  5. One block of flats in the north-west of the site encroaches on the existing footpath, leaving pedestrians to walk in the roadway.

  6. The design of a 'signature¹ block in the south of the site will plunge accommodation on the ground floor into almost permanent shadow.

  7. Disabled access between different areas of the site is inadequate and/or hazardous.

  8. One block of flats with a bin store on the lower level has no access for collection vehicles.
    Some ‘soft landscaping’ areas are inaccessible to residents.

  9. Poor design of some blocks will create crime zones.

 

You can see the plans by clicking on the following link: PLANS

If you want to comment on the plans you will need to do so by December 15.
Write to:Borough Planning Officer, Hastings Borough Council, Aquila House, Breeds Place, Hastings TN34 3UY.
Quote Planning Application No HS/FA/09/00482.
You can also submit your comments online to Hastings Borough Council by clicking on the following link: COMMENTS